Stock Market -- Longer Term Issues #2

For more years than I care to remember, I have worked on the assumption that, over the long pull,
US business would grow about 6% annually. The figuring has been 3% real growth in output of
goods and services and 3% in pricing gains (inflation). This assumption has served well in many
ways, but now it is threatened. The 3% real growth factor has been based on a combination of
projected gains in the labor force plus productivity increases. In recent years though, labor force
growth has decelerated to about 1% per annum and productivity to below 1.5%. Moreover,
business pricing power has fallen well under 3%, down to 1%. Now, US business sales growth
potential is but 3.5%. If profit margins hold up, earnings should also grow by 3.5%, and if you
want to earn 10% on risk capital, then the market p/e ratio must rise steadily or the dividend
yield must be substantially higher or some combination of the both must obtain. Nothing will be
tidy or welcoming here.

Many investment strategy commentators, now mindful of seemingly more modest growth ahead,
are saying that the market is set to deliver lower, but positive returns going forward and that it
is time to set one's sights on the prospects for more modest total returns over the longer term.
But, they say, this is still bullish, since the returns on high grade bonds and Treasuries will be
lower than for stocks. If this be true, my reaction would be to not bother with stocks or bonds
except under rare conditions and focus your attention elsewhere.

The liquidity to support faster growth and higher inflation is there.With operating rates just above
75%, there are ample physical resources to support faster economic expansion and to trigger
faster capital spending to keep up as needed. The work force remains seriously underemployed
and if the US presses on, businesses will find ways to bring the longer term unemployed off the
sidelines, and in Washington, pressures can be brought to bear to create a balanced program of
of increasing immigration based primarily on skills and much less so on ethnicity. If needs be,
there are a range of fiscal initiatives that can enacted to spur growth and tax policies developed
to help finance such programs. This is easy stuff for sensible people to do for Christ's sake.

So, I am not ready to buy off on a new 'era' or 'paradigm' of low everything and since no one
is paying me to chart the fortunes of the US, I am at liberty to move on from this blog to other
stuff if people do not start to wake up and fly right soon.